Archive

Archive for November, 2009

Plant, Animal, and Stone

November 24, 2009 2 comments

Did you miss me?  So did I.  In this post, I’ll talk about the museum I visited the weekend before last and about flintknapping.

As I said, the weekend was a lot of fun.  My father took me to visit the Connecticut Museum of Mining & Mineral Science in Kent, CT.  There a man named John A. Pawloski spent a good deal of his time showing me the museum and teaching me about primitive technologies.

The exterior of the museum was paved with bricks, but not in the usual way.  Historically, brick makers have frequently imprinted their bricks with a mark indicating the manufacturer.  Usually brick is laid so that this part is hidden.  But at this museum, the brick marks are all turned outward so we can see them.  That’s a good place to begin describing the character of the place.  It’s about technology, but more fundamentally it’s about people.  Everywhere you look it tells you a story not just about the way something worked, but who made it work and how it affected people.  When I saw that, I felt I had really come to the right place.

First, John showed me around the museum.  It’s amazing.  A lot of work has gone into it and when John tells me about it I can hear in his voice that he is proud – as he should be.  The mineral collection is beautiful, with samples far more impressive than I’ve seen at more famous museums.  He told me about many improvements planned and in-the-works.  It is an ongoing labor of love, and it definitely shows.

Here are some more photos (courtesy of John A. Pawloski).  Click to enlarge:

John is a primitive technologist.  What that means can range from hobby to profession.  I think in John’s case, it’s a little of both.  It turns out there are many organizations devoted to studying, teaching, and practicing primitive technologies.  Here are some links to the websites of a few of them:

Primitive technologists are frequently involved with experimental archeology.  Experimental archeology seeks to learn about the distant past not just by examining artifacts but by actually trying to experience aspects of ancient life.  Sound familiar?  ;-)  By making a concrete attempt to reconstruct a way of doing things conjectured based on material evidence, archeologists can discover which theories are plausible, from a practical standpoint, and which are not (i.e. “We have discovered, by trying it out, that this would not have been a practical way to do it.”).  It is the same question of practical plausibility that leads archeologists to look at indigenous American cultures to help answer questions about cultures in the paleolithic era – using similar materials and pattern of subsistence, they are an example of a way of life that we know works.

Although I specifically asked about making stone tools (flintknapping), John told me a lot about all kinds of ways a paleolithic person might make tools (and other useful things).  Tools can be made from plant parts, animal parts, stones, and combinations thereof.  As discussed in a prior post, you can use vines for tying things and fibrous plants to make cord / rope, for tying things even better.  You can also use sap, and other plant products, as an adhesive.  And of course, woody plants give you … wood!  Wood can be carved into all kinds of useful shapes.  Soaking strips of wood in water can temporarily soften them so they can be bent into shape.  Sticks and tree branches can often be used as-is.  Wood, and dry leaves, also do something else very important.  They burn.  But there will be another post all about that.  ;-)

Dead animals are also extremely useful for making things.  Bones can be turned into cutting tools, skin can be used for clothing and as a covering for a shelter, and strips of skin can tie things together as can ligaments.  Mollusk shells can be used for scraping or they can be fractured to form a sharp edge and used for cutting.

Finally, rocks.  Rocks come in many varieties and shapes naturally, so you can often pick one up and find that it’s already a useful tool.  At the very least many of them are good for banging on things to break or dent them.  But some very useful rock shapes are hard to come by in nature, so humans have devised ways to reshape rocks to meet their needs.  It’s called “flintknapping” and it amounts to chipping pieces off of rocks until they’re the right shape.

But the name is misleading.  Flint is one type of rock, but there are many kinds of rock out there, often more plentiful than flint, that can be chipped with varying degrees of difficulty.  Why does flint get all the fame and glory?  It is easier to chip than many other kinds of rock, but its main advantage is the way it fractures.  Geologists call it “conchoidal fracture”.  Named after the curved shape of a conch, it is the fracture pattern seen when the fracture is not constrained directionally by the properties of the material.  In addition to flint, most notably, obsidian (a volcanic glass) fractures this way.  Not surprisingly, it is also a favored rock for making tools.

Conchoidal fracture is useful for two reasons.  Firstly, the way the rock breaks depends on how you strike it, not on the orientation of a crystalline structure.  That makes it easier to work with.  Secondly, the edge formed by the crossing of two conchoidal fractures can be extraordinarily sharp.  Sharper, even, than the sharpest steel blades (but more brittle).  So this makes for some really good cutting tools.

John sat with me and demonstrated the various techniques of flintknapping along with ways the resulting tools can be used.  Here and there my father also chimed in with helpful information.  As it happens, he is a geologist.  Now I will tell you about those techniques, but I will also use the book “Flintknapping”, by John C. Whittaker, as a reference.

First we have hard-hammer percussion.  The idea is simple: just hit the core (the piece you are knocking flakes off of) with another rock.  It works best if you use a fast motion, grazing the edge of the core.  If you hit the middle of the core hard, the whole thing will shatter into many small pieces.  Hard-hammer percussion can get you long, smooth, sharp edges … if you do it just right.  This takes a lot of skill.

Photo by Stanley Schleifer, courtesy of John A. Powloski

A technique which is easier to control, but which creates a more “serrated” edge, is pressure flaking.  This is how the typical arrowhead is made.  The idea is that you apply controlled pressure to a spot on the core and increase the pressure until a small piece breaks off.  This is done using another tool.  John demonstrated using a piece of antler.  The book also recommends wearing something to protect your wrists while pressure flaking, as sharp flakes are likely to strike you there.  And, of course, eye protection is a given for all of these techniques.

Soft-hammer percussion is often used for creating finely shaped edges.  This is like hard-hammer percussion, but you strike the core with something softer such as a bone or piece of wood, rather than another rock.  Generally, the “soft hammer” would be hit on the other side by a rock to drive it percussively into the edge of the core.

John also demonstrated shaping other, softer rocks, such as soapstone, by grinding them with harder rocks (or bones).  He also let me try drilling the soapstone with a bow drill (a tool I’ll discuss more for fire-making).

I did get an opportunity to try some of these techniques there at the museum, but I didn’t have any eye protection, so most of my work has to wait until I get some.  John wears prescription eyeglasses, so he was fine.

The mining museum is actually part of a larger site called the Connecticut Antique Machinery Association.  So before I left, John and some of his fellow antique machinery enthusiasts took me to another building at the same site.  It was the “Industrial Hall of Steam Power”.  Incredible.  Huge, historical steam engines rebuilt and operational.  I’ll write more about that later, because I’ll surely return there when I get to steam engines!  In the mean time, I recommend this place.  Go see it for yourself.  …when it opens again.  It was closed for the season, but John agreed to show me around anyway.  :-)

When it was time to go, John sent me home with plenty of materials to practice on.  Thank you, again, John!  And also thank you to my dad.  I’d better get cracking!  Er … flaking, I mean.

Thank you for reading!

I’m Still Alive

November 22, 2009 1 comment

…in case you were wondering.  But I’m sick.  Nothing serious.

I regret not posting here for a week, but between finishing my move and getting sick the post I’ve been working on has been coming along very slowly.  It’s about half done and I could probably finish it tonight, but a sick boy ought to sleep.

Nonetheless, I assure you I’ve been working on Grok Project things and posts will come.  I’m hoping to pick up some speed when this month is over.

Have a good night.  I, myself, will thoroughly enjoy at last sleeping in my new apartment on a bed rather than an air mattress.  :-)

Thanks for reading!

Tags: ,

Miscellaneous Update

November 15, 2009 1 comment

Greetings!

I had a good weekend.  :-)

DSCF0109

Photo by Stanley Schleifer, courtesy of John A. Pawloski

But, once again, the full report will not be immediate.  I have to admit, this month is proving to be overwhelming.  There’s a lot going on in addition to my first month of Grok Project.  But I foresee getting the hang of the project (insomuch as that is possible) and getting my life to settle down in the coming month.  So I’ll not panic.  I’ll not panic.  I’ll not panic…

Thanks to a comment by JeffR, I’ve added an “Email Subscription” widget to my blog.  You can use it to sign up to receive Grok Project posts as emails.  Check out the link on the right side of the site.

I’ve also added a link to my Twitter account.  I’ll be using it pretty much exclusively for posting links to new Grok Project posts.  Feel free to follow me on Twitter.

You can also add the Grok Project feed to your LiveJournal Account.

And, as before, you can use the link on the right to become a fan on Facebook.

Coming up are the report on Saturday’s flintknapping lesson and the long overdue discussion of what the paleolithic era actually is.

Thank you for reading!

In Connecticut

November 13, 2009 Leave a comment

Here I am in Connecticut!  This promises to be a wet weekend, so attempt #1 of fire-making may have to be postponed.  But I’m on track to learn flintknapping with John Pawloski tomorrow.  I will, of course, let you all know how it goes.

Thank you for reading.  :-)

Veterans Day

November 11, 2009 1 comment

Flag_of_the_United_States

Click for image source.

For those of you who are United States citizens, please take time today to thank the U.S. veterans in your lives and communities.

 

 

Thank you!

An Interesting Twist

November 11, 2009 3 comments

IN THIS POST: Theory and practice of twisted rope and how I spent my weekend.

Much of paleolithic technology is about simple mechanics.  To many people, the word “mechanics” refers to machinery the likes of which one does not see in a paleolithic culture.  But to a physicist, mechanics is just the way various materials respond to different kinds of forces.

One straightforward example is the need for materials that can hold a rigid shape when forces are applied to them.  Easy enough.  They’re called “rocks”.  If you have the right kind of rock, it will stay in the same shape under all kinds of forces.  Go ahead.  Slam that coconut down.  The coconut will lose.  And if you get even more specific about the mechanical properties of your rocks, you can pick out ones that let you modify the shape they will hold … thus: flintknapping.  That’s one of the things I plan on doing this coming weekend.

But the topic of this post in not this coming weekend, but rather this past weekend.  What if I want a material that responds very differently to one kind of force than it does to others?  Such as, for instance, yielding easily to torques (i.e. forces that bend the material) but strongly resisting tension (i.e. force that tries to pull the material apart).  Rope fits that description.

Of course, we’d probably start out by using natural objects that can perform the function without modification.  Vines would do quite nicely.  All we have to do is invent knots and we can use vines to bind things together or pull things from a distance.

But vines are only so strong.  If the tension goes too high, they’ll break.  What if we want to pull harder?  It turns out that in many plants that can resist tension like that, it’s just one part of the plant that does it really well.  Find a plant that makes it easy to separate those fibers from the rest of the plant and you can bundle just those strong fibers together, making something that can handle a lot more tension without breaking.

But why twist the fibers?  Because it’s pretty?  Well, yes, it is.  But the more practical reason that easily comes to mind is that it holds all the fibers together.  That’s definitely much easier to work with than a bunch of separate fibers.  But there is another, less obvious, reason.  None of those fibers is all that strong on its own.  The strength of a rope comes from the fact that its many constituent fibers bear more or less an equal share of the load.  But how do we know this “equal share” thing will actually happen?  If we begin pulling on our untwisted bundle of fibers, there’s a good chance one of them will become taught before the others do.  The fibers are going to be at least a little bit elastic (i.e. stretchy), so if our fiber-on-the-front-lines can stretch far enough without breaking, then other fibers will become taught as well and share the load … but not evenly.

In the process of twisting the fibers tightly, we create a little bit of tension within the rope.  As we leave each twist behind and move on to the next, the fibers can slide against each other, equalizing minor differences in internal tension.  When the rope is finished, friction between the fibers keeps any one fiber from slackening more than the others.  So by twisting these natural fibers together, we can create something that is actually much stronger than a mere bundle would be, in practice.  The whole is greater than the sum of its parts!

I spent this past Saturday with Alexandra Thorn and Tim McCormack.  I’m very glad I did!  Not only are they great company; they’re also fountains of knowledge about the various plants we looked at in our quest for useful fibers.

IMG_7130

Photo by Tim McCormack (click for license)

We started by grabbing some lunch in Davis Square and set out, eating on the go, toward a certain bike path.  This beautiful bike path was lined with gardens, wild flora, and colorful fall foliage.  Tim and Alex led me down the path identifying plants left and right – explaining what they can be used for, what plants they’re related to, etc….  I retained virtually none of it.  What I did retain is a sense of how a paleolithic person might see the world differently than I do.  I’ve trained my brain to identify and distinguish numbers, words, streets that deliberately look all alike, electronic components, and all the other things that have been directly important to me.  These are things I suspect a caveman might have some trouble with.  But those plants all just look like plants to me unless someone is explaining the relevant differences to me at the moment.

IMG_7115Tim offered an example of this as we were walking.  A modern, urban human, arriving at a new neighborhood, would pass a grocery store and without even thinking about it would make a mental note of its location.  Maybe she’s not hungry now, but sooner or later she will be.  But that same person, stranded in the woods for a long time, might not make a note of the location of a tree which, though barren now, will soon bear fruit.  She’d have to change her way of seeing the world for that to happen.

As we continued down the path, both Alex and Tim stopped and appeared instantly crestfallen.  They were staring at a bulldozer and a flattened stretch of path beyond it.  This, they explained, was not long ago overgrown with all sorts of useful plants.  Most importantly to me, dogbane – a good source of fibers for making rope.  The bike path was to be extended.

IMG_7156

Photo by Tim McCormack (click for license)

With a few pieces of dogbane left here and there, Tim and Alex began teaching me to make rope.  We also used some milkweed which was around.  Instead of describing the process here, I’ll refer you to an “Instructable” that Tim created: http://www.instructables.com/id/Make-rope-out-of-dead-plants—-with-no-tools/.

Photo by Tim McCormack (click for license)

Photo by Tim McCormack (click for license)

On the way back, we sampled fennel seeds and nibbled on various leaves and berries.  Retiring to Alex’s apartment, she made hot chocolate and we sat around and discussed many things.  I was even served a tasty “paleolithic stew”.  It did have potatoes and beans in it.  ;-)  It was a very good day.

…and I went home with more milkweed and a bit of dogbane so I can make a more substantial rope.  And some pine needles for making tea.

PB100204

Tim and Alex went home with some dogbane plants so that they could add it to a garden.  :-)

Thank you, once again, to Alex and Tim!  And thank you all for reading!

Moving Is Good

November 9, 2009 Leave a comment

I know you’re all hanging on my every word.  So I’m very sorry to tell you that my next substantive post is still not ready.  But I have an excuse!  You see, I’m in the middle of moving.  :-D   Moving is good.

 

 

PB090159

So empty...

PB090161

So full of possibility...

 

 

 

Stay tuned for actual content.  Thanks for reading!

A Good Day

November 7, 2009 Leave a comment

Today’s expedition was a lot of fun.  It was not without some disappointment, but I’ll talk about that later.  The important part is that I learned a lot and had a great time.  Thank you again to Alex and Tim!

I have a lot of information to process now and a lot to talk about, but I’m not prepared to make a full report tonight.  I’m aiming for tomorrow.

For tonight, I’ll just take a moment to thank Gwen Kelly, an old friend of mine and an archeology student who has agreed to help me make sense of the paleolithic era.  I knew I had a lot of very smart and talented friends and family members, but they just keep surprising me (in a good way).  At some point soon, I’d like to devote a post to explaining just how great they all are.

Thanks for reading!

Paper Mill Hill

November 6, 2009 1 comment

Can anyone tell me where Paper Mill Hill in Peabody, MA is, specifically?  Is it on someone’s private property?  According to http://www.mindat.org/loc-33589.html it seems there is some chert (flint) to be found there.  The first challenge of making stone tools is to find the right rocks to work with!  If I can’t find a natural flint deposit, then I can try store-bought obsidian.  I think the man who’ll be helping me with flintknapping might have some flint to spare too.  We’ll see.

Tomorrow I’ll be harvesting dogbane and learning to make rope / cord from it!  I’m very excited.  I may also get some help with some other things tomorrow as well.  I will, obviously, let you know how it goes.

I’m not going to post much today, but I’ll let you know about a few of the topics I hope to post about soon (in no particular order):

  • Overview of the Paleolithic Age
  • Modern Indigenous Cultures – What Can / Can’t They Tell Us About Paleolithic Cultures
  • The Physics of Spear Throwing (in several parts)
  • Scales of Time (geologic time, astronomical time, etc…)
  • Paleolithic Fiction
  • Human Patterns of Subsistence
  • Speculations on the Origins of Fire and Cooking

…and of course, updates on my progress with the tasks.

Thank you for reading!

Question me an answer.

November 5, 2009 5 comments

Today’s dinner was sashimi.  I squirmed my way through it.  I think paleolithic humans were less picky about food textures than I am.

Tim McCormack commented with some good questions and suggestions regarding this paleolithic diet, so I’ll respond to them here…

1. “You may wish to find out what the natives in some region of North America ate, and stick to that.”

That would be great, but I don’t think it’s feasible.  It doesn’t look to me like there’s enough information available to reconstruct the diet of one region.  We’re also dealing with a very large time span.  The upper paleolithic (i.e. the most recent part of the paleolithic age) alone is longer than the entire span of recorded history.  So the diet in one specific region may have undergone significant changes.  If someone who is an expert on this would like to chime in with the specific information I have been unable to find, please do so!

It’s this lack of specific information which lead me not to try to replicate an actual paleolithic diet.  Instead I’m just trying to vaguely approximate the most dramatic contrasts between a modern diet and a paleolithic one.  I figured that the “paleolithic diet” movement was a good place to start.  I may have been mistaken, but I’m trying to make the most of it.  ;-)

2. “Availability of food varies by time of year, not just location. How much food do you suppose was harvested and then cached for later consumption?”

I don’t have an answer to this question and none of the books or websites I’ve looked at go into that much detail.  I suspect that the best there is to be found on that subject is speculation.  So here’s mine: foods which naturally last a while, such as nuts, were probably stored up for winter.  Meat was probably sometimes preserved by freezing in the snow (where the climate would allow it).  But of course, the most cacheable foods had not yet caught on: grains.

I’m going to track down an archeology professor to help answer this and other questions.

3. “Non-agricultural diets will probably include a high percentage derived from animals, and it not just muscle and fat. Ready to eat some random viscera?”

Random viscera?  No.  I at least want to know what I’m eating.  Brains and connective tissues are kind of off the table.  Sorry.  :-P  But liver, heart, tongue, etc… bring it on.  Liver I can get at the grocery store.  Other organ meats may be harder to track down.  I’ll work on that.  Also remember that hunting is on my list.  Should I kill an animal, I will attempt to use every part of it that I can.

4. “How do you suppose the caloric requirements of our ancestors compared to ours today?”

The requirements?  First intuition suggests that they required far more energy than the couch potatoes of today.  But second intuition, at least in my case, suggests that it may not be so simple.  How much energy we require may be related to how much is available during our formative years.  Or perhaps their cultures were adapted to lower availability.  Maybe they … fidgeted less.

I’ll bet there is a fair amount of research about this particular question.  I shall endeavor to find it.

Now… just so nobody is surprised and disappointed, I have decided that “1 week” is five days, not seven.  At least as far as this full-on paleo diet goes.  Why?  Because it leaves me feeling weak and hungry at inopportune times throughout the day.  It may very well be that, given enough time, my body would fully adapt to this, but I need to get on with other Grok Project tasks this weekend.  So tomorrow will be the last day of the diet.  I’ll still make a point of eating some “organ meat” as I don’t think I’ve every done that before.

Thanks for reading!